Computational design of a high-precision mitochondrial DNA cytosine base editor
Silva-Pinheiro, P. & Minczuk, M. The potential of mitochondrial genome engineering. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 199–214 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bacman, S. R., Williams, S. L., Pinto, M., Peralta, S. & Moraes, C. T. Specific elimination of mutant mitochondrial genomes in patient-derived cells by mitoTALENs. Nat. Med. 19, 1111–1113 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gammage, P. A., Rorbach, J., Vincent, A. I., Rebar, E. J. & Minczuk, M. Mitochondrially targeted ZFNs for selective degradation of pathogenic mitochondrial genomes bearing large-scale deletions or point mutations. EMBO Mol. Med. 6, 458–466 (2014).
Google Scholar
Mok, B. Y. et al. A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing. Nature 583, 631–637 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cho, S.-I. et al. Targeted A-to-G base editing in human mitochondrial DNA with programmable deaminases. Cell 185, 1764–1776 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yi, Z. et al. Strand-selective base editing of human mitochondrial DNA using mitoBEs. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 498–509 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hu, J. et al. Strand-preferred base editing of organellar and nuclear genomes using CyDENT. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 936–945 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lim, K., Cho, S.-I. & Kim, J.-S. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA editing in human cells with zinc finger deaminases. Nat. Commun. 13, 366 (2022).
Google Scholar
Willis, J. C. W., Silva-Pinheiro, P., Widdup, L., Minczuk, M. & Liu, D. R. Compact zinc finger base editors that edit mitochondrial or nuclear DNA in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Commun. 13, 7204 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X., et al. Precise modelling of mitochondrial diseases using optimized mitoBEs. Nature 639, 735–745 (2025).
Google Scholar
Chu, A. E., Lu, T. & Huang, P.-S. Sparks of function by de novo protein design. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 203–215 (2024).
Google Scholar
Listov, D., Goverde, C. A., Correia, B. E. & Fleishman, S. J. Opportunities and challenges in design and optimization of protein function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 639–653 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kortemme, T. De novo protein design—from new structures to programmable functions. Cell 187, 526–544 (2024).
Google Scholar
Deng, D. et al. Structural basis for sequence-specific recognition of DNA by TAL effectors. Science 335, 720–723 (2012).
Google Scholar
Mi, L. et al. DddA homolog search and engineering expand sequence compatibility of mitochondrial base editing. Nat. Commun. 14, 874 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yin, L., Shi, K. & Aihara, H. Structural basis of sequence-specific cytosine deamination by double-stranded DNA deaminase toxin DddA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1153–1159 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mok, Y. G. et al. Base editing in human cells with monomeric DddA–TALE fusion deaminases. Nat. Commun. 13, 4038 (2022).
Google Scholar
Watson, J. L. et al. De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature 620, 1089–1100 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dauparas, J. et al. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science 378, 49–56 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mok, B. Y. et al. CRISPR-free base editors with enhanced activity and expanded targeting scope in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1378–1387 (2022).
Google Scholar
Neugebauer, M. E. et al. Evolution of an adenine base editor into a small, efficient cytosine base editor with low off-target activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 673–685 (2023).
Google Scholar
Doyle, E. L. et al. TAL Effector–Nucleotide Targeter (TALE-NT) 2.0: tools for TAL effector design and target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W117–W122 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hameed, S. & Tadi, P. Myoclonic Epilepsy and Ragged Red Fibers (StatPearls, 2023).
Ripolone, M., et al. MERRF mutation A8344G in a four-generation family without central nervous system involvement: clinical and molecular characterization. J. Pers. Med. 13, 147 (2023).
Google Scholar
Burrage, L. C. et al. Mitochondrial myopathy, lactic acidosis, and sideroblastic anemia (MLASA) plus associated with a novel de novo mutation (m.8969G>A) in the mitochondrial encoded ATP6 gene. Mol. Genet. Metab. 113, 207–212 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wen, S. et al. Identification of G8969>A in mitochondrial ATP6 gene that severely compromises ATP synthase function in a patient with IgA nephropathy. Sci. Rep. 6, 36313 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lee, S., Lee, H., Baek, G. & Kim, J.-S. Precision mitochondrial DNA editing with high-fidelity DddA-derived base editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 378–386 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lei, Z. et al. Mitochondrial base editor induces substantial nuclear off-target mutations. Nature 606, 804–811 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kauppila, J. H. K. et al. A phenotype-driven approach to generate mouse models with pathogenic mtDNA mutations causing mitochondrial disease. Cell Rep. 16, 2980–2990 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. Age-dependent accumulation of mitochondrial tRNA mutations in mouse kidneys linked to mitochondrial kidney diseases. Nat. Aging 5, 1317–1339 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lott, M. T. et al. mtDNA variation and analysis using Mitomap and Mitomaster. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 44, 1.23.21–21.23.26 (2013).
Nguyen, E. et al. Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo. Science 386, eado9336 (2024).
Google Scholar
He, Y. et al. Protein language models-assisted optimization of a uracil-N-glycosylase variant enables programmable T-to-G and T-to-C base editing. Mol. Cell 84, 1257–1270 (2024).
Google Scholar
Guo, J. et al. A DddA ortholog-based and transactivator-assisted nuclear and mitochondrial cytosine base editors with expanded target compatibility. Mol. Cell 83, 1710–1724 (2023).
Google Scholar
Huang, J. et al. Discovery of deaminase functions by structure-based protein clustering. Cell 186, 3182–3195 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sun, H. et al. Developing mitochondrial base editors with diverse context compatibility and high fidelity via saturated spacer library. Nat. Commun. 14, 6625 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cheng, K. Engineering RsDddA as mitochondrial base editor with wide target compatibility and enhanced activity. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 34, 102028 (2023).
Fauser, F. et al. Compact zinc finger architecture utilizing toxin-derived cytidine deaminases for highly efficient base editing in human cells. Nat. Commun. 15, 1181 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cho, S.-I. et al. Engineering TALE-linked deaminases to facilitate precision adenine base editing in mitochondrial DNA. Cell 187, 95–109 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kang, B.-C. et al. Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA editing in plants. Nat. Plants 7, 899–905 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, J.-S. & Chen, J. Base editing of organellar DNA with programmable deaminases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 34–45 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S. & Zhang, Y. MM-align: a quick algorithm for aligning multiple-chain protein complex structures using iterative dynamic programming. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e83 (2009).
Google Scholar
Yang, J., Guo, S., Yuan, P. & Wei, W. in TALENs: Methods and Protocols (eds Kühn, R. et al.) 49–60 (Springer, 2016).
Thompson, R. F., Iadanza, M. G., Hesketh, E. L., Rawson, S. & Ranson, N. A. Collection, pre-processing and on-the-fly analysis of data for high-resolution, single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 14, 100–118 (2019).
Google Scholar
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xu, K., Wang, Z., Shi, J., Li, H. & Zhang, Q. C. A2-Net: molecular structure estimation from cryo-EM density volumes. In Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 33, 1230–1237 (AAAI, 2019).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Google Scholar
Song, Y. et al. High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM. Structure 21, 1735–1742 (2013).
Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Google Scholar
Clement, K. et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 224–226 (2019).
Google Scholar
Diroma, M. A., Ciaccia, L., Pesole, G. & Picardi, E. Elucidating the editome: bioinformatics approaches for RNA editing detection. Brief. Bioinform. 20, 436–447 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ru, Y. et al. Maternal age enhances purifying selection on pathogenic mutations in complex I genes of mammalian mtDNA. Nat. Aging 4, 1211–1230 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chen, T. et al. The Genome Sequence Archive family: toward explosive data growth and diverse data types. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 19, 578–583 (2021).
Google Scholar
CNCB-NGDC Members and Partners. Database resources of the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D27–D38 (2021).
Google Scholar
Computational design of a high-precision mitochondrial DNA cytosine base editor. Figshare (2025).
link
